Who was the plaintiff in Morse v Frederick?
Plaintiff Joseph Frederick
Plaintiff Joseph Frederick, his attorney Doug Mertz, and ACLU legal director Steven Shapiro talk about student free speech rights.
Who was the plaintiff in the Bong Hits 4 Jesus case?
Joseph Frederick
The case began in January 2002 when Joseph Frederick, an 18-year-old student at Juneau-Douglas High School in Alaska, unfurled a 14-foot banner with the message “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” as the Winter Olympics torch relay passed by a public street near his school.
What was the Morse v Frederick case about and who won the case?
Frederick. Morse v. Frederick, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 2007, ruled (5–4) that Alaskan school officials had not violated a student’s First Amendment freedom of speech rights after suspending him for displaying, at a school event, a banner that was seen as promoting illegal drug use.
How did the school justify Frederick punishment?
Joseph Frederick, a public school student, was suspended after he held up a banner with the message “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” at a televised school event, referring to marijuana smoking. Morse, the school principal, argued that suspending Frederick and taking away his banner was justified based on a school policy that …
What does bong hits for Jesus mean?
Roberts deconstructs “Bong hits 4 Jesus” as either “[You take] bong hits,” an “imperative encouraging viewers to smoke marijuana.” Or “[We take] bong hits,” a declarative that he reads as celebrating illegal drug use and encouraging other students to use drugs.
What was the main result of Morse v Frederick quizlet?
What was the ruling in this case? The Supreme Court ruled that Frederick’s First Amendment rights were not violated and that “schools may take steps to safeguard those entrusted to their care from speech that can reasonably be regarded as encouraging illegal drug use.”
Is Morse v Frederick a landmark case?
The case, Morse v. Frederick, concerned the rights of a public school student to unfurl a banner reading “Bong hits 4 Jesus” at a school-sponsored event held off school grounds. We begin this school year with this landmark case on the rights of public school students.
What does Bong hits for Jesus mean?
What happened in Bong Hits for Jesus?
At a school-supervised event, Joseph Frederick held up a banner with the message “Bong Hits 4 Jesus,” a slang reference to marijuana smoking. Principal Deborah Morse took away the banner and suspended Frederick for ten days.
What’s a bong hit?
Filters. The inhalation of marijuana smoke through a bong. Jim took such a big bong hit that he coughed for a whole minute. noun.
What was the outcome in Morse v Frederick 2007 quizlet?
How did the Morse v Frederick case affect student speech as it pertained to the First Amendment quizlet?
The Supreme Court ruled that Frederick’s first amendment rights were not violated and schools are allowed to regulate speech reasonably to discourage drug use. In that decision, the Court had ruled that public schools can regulate student speech that is vulgar, lewd, or plainly offensive.”
What was the decision of Morse v . Frederick?
Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 5–4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing, at or across the street from a school-supervised event, student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use.
Who was the plaintiff in Morse v . Frederick?
CITATION The name of the case is Morse v.Frederick. Morse is the plaintiff; Frederick is the defendant. The United States Supreme Court decided this case in 2007. The citation states that this case can be found in Volume 127 of the Supreme Court Reporter,on page 2618.
Who won the Morse v . Frederick case?
Frederick sued under 42 U.S.C. 1983, the federal civil rights statute, alleging a violation of his First Amendment right to freedom of speech. The District Court found no constitutional violation and ruled in favor of Morse.
What is Morse et al v Frederick?
Morse v. Frederick , (551 U.S. 393 (2007)), is a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held, 5-4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use at or across the street from a school-supervised event.